
Main Menu
| Home |
| Investigations |
| EVP's |
| MW Members |
| Membership |
| About Us |
| Awards |
| Chapters |
| Protocols |
| Contact Us |
| Request Investigation |
| Gathering |
| References |
| Jo-ann |
| MW Store |
| Site Map |
Ghost Study
| Articles |
| Experiments |
| Ghost Weather |
| Tool Box |
| Documents |
Interactive
| Ghost Pictures |
| Links |
| Vote 4 Us |
| Ghostly Chat |
| Forums |

| False Orb Experiment |
|
False Orb ExperimentBy Rich Purpose
The false orb experiment is intended to offer a large selection of non-paranormal orb pictures, descriptions, and production methods. A large array of reference images will be very helpful for determining potential authentic paranormal orb images. The experiment will give information on what caused the false orb. Descriptions of how the orbs were produced is also available for people who want to repeat the experiment themselves to see if their results match. Camera Set-up
I used a Cannon PowerShot A520 digital camera for the photographic false orb experiment. The camera settings are as follows: Shooting mode - aperture priority with full open aperture of f2.6 I placed the tripod mounted camera on the back steps to face the open field. This arrangement provided an elevated location for an increased camera to ground distance to minimize reflected light from the flash. I wanted to keep the background black without any nearby objects or ground showing up. This will provide maximum contrast for the resulting false orb images. I leveled the camera and then took a few test shots to determine background darkness. It was dark enough to proceed. For the dust orbs, I shook a mass of dust/lint above the front of the camera to form a cloud of dust while the camera was shooting is succession. For the insect photos, I mounted a black light with a reflector just below the camera in order to attract enough insects for good pictures. Panoramic daytime view of my back yard showing the open field using described setup
Dust Orb ExperimentI shook clumps of lint above the front of the camera while it was taking pictures in succession. I first used lint from the drier and then the vacuum cleaner. Noticing some colored dust orbs in the photos, I decided to try shaking some red colored shirts to produce red lint to see if the colored dust orbs would be predominately red. Red dust orbs were very scarce. Moving back to using dust from the vacuum, I took some more pictures with the aperture stopped down to f6.3 to see its effects. ResultsDrier lint produced a general mix of white, grey and some colored orbs. Although the lint strands were generally around a thirty-second to an eighth inch long the resulting orbs were mostly round. The dust from the vacuum tended to have very few white orbs and the grey orbs were usually darker. The vacuum dust has a large proportion of fine silt particles which have a tendency to produce a greater abundance of grey orbs due to their small size and darker shade. The number of colored orbs was about the same for both. The red lint produced only two red orbs but it made mostly tan and cream colored orbs suggesting that lint color has a slight effect on orb color. No other colors were produced from the red lint. I suspect most of the color comes from light diffraction. Colored orbs came from the vacuum dust which has almost no colored lint or silt in it. The drier lint only had a few colors but orbs of other colors showed up. The red lint has a smooth surface which does not produce diffraction effects which resulted in no atypical colored orbs. The variety of colors was similar to the diffraction colors as seen on a CD or DVD. I consider very little of the colors coming from refractive dispersion, like a rainbow or from a gem, because the color magenta shows up which cannot be produced by refraction. Nearly all of the particles in the drier lint and vacuum dust lacked the transparency needed to produce such vivid color in this manner. The reduced aperture had a strong effect on the dust orbs, making them smaller and hexagonal in shape. All but the brightest orbs show the hexagonal shape. The most heavily overexposed orbs have lost some of the hex shape but generally show up when the image is darkened a great deal. These effects are very repeatable and easy to identify.
Midnite-walkers.com/False-Orb-Experiment, Midnite-walkers.com/False-Orb-Experiment, Minnesota and Missouri Paranormal Investigators and Ghost Hunters, Specializing in Paranormal Investigations,Study of Ghostly Activity, Urban Legends,Ghost Hunting Equipment and Haunted Houses and Ghost Hunting
Minnesota and Missouri Paranormal Investigators and Ghost Hunters, Specializing in Paranormal Investigations,Study of Ghostly Activity, Urban Legends,Ghost Hunting Equipment and Haunted Houses and Ghost Hunting Flying Insect False Orb ExperimentI placed a black light underneath the camera. Checked the camera settings and then turned on the light. I waited about five to ten minutes. Then I took about fifty pictures. ResultsThe insect orbs are mostly irregular in shape often resembling the insect especially the larger closer ones. Round insect orbs are rare. Insect orbs are also very brilliantly white frequently overexposing the image. There extreme brilliancy is due to the insect’s relative large physical size as compared to dust or lint. This larger size provides more area to reflect the light from the flash to the camera lens. There images are typically smaller then other orb types due to the fact that further out insects will show up in the picture.
Raw images of insect orbs and insect orbs with dust orbs – Observe the irregular shape, brilliancy, and average size as compared to the dust orbs.
Composite picture showing the typical irregular shape and high brilliancy of insect orbs. Image sizeshave been scaled to a similar size for easer comparison of shape and brightness.
Composite picture showing the typical image overexposure associated with insect orbs. Originals are to the left, pictures showing overexposure are to the right. Slight overexposure shows up as colored regions. Black central regions show heavy overexposure.
|
||||||||||||||

























